Live betting in New Zealand 2026: what the only legal pair actually charge you

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Before a ball is thrown, a race is run or a price ticker so much as flinches, a New Zealand punter runs into a wall most readers from other countries never meet. There are no ten rivals to weigh against each other. There is one operator group with two brands on top of it, and a long list of offshore sites that New Zealand law now expressly tells you not to use. The shape of that wall decides almost everything on this page: which apps to install, what “live betting” means inside them, what you can pay with, what a deposit-limit tool looks like, who answers the phone if your account locks you out, and what the answer to “is betting with an offshore bookmaker safe here” actually is.

Current as of 30 October 2026 — checked against the Department of Internal Affairs’ framing of section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020 and the Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025 as in force since 28 June 2025.

TAB and Betcha, side by side: where the two legal brands charge differently

The interesting comparison on this page is small. There are two brands — TAB and Betcha — and they are owned by the same operator, TAB New Zealand. They are not rivals in the way a betting shop might be rival to another betting shop in another country. They are two front doors to one set of prices, one wallet and one customer-protection framework, with the marketing and the app skin dialed differently. The section below holds the comparison that has to live somewhere on a New Zealand live-betting page; the rest of the article goes deeper into each one and into what the law does for the punter.

The two-row table above is the comparison the New Zealand market actually contains — and the thing that, in any other market, represents a ten-row table. A punter comparing them looks at price depth, race-meeting coverage, how the multi builder lays out, and how app-heavy the live experience feels; what they do not need to compare is the legality or the dispute route, because the row underneath reads the same either way. The cost-of-the-bet question — how much you forfeit to the bookmaker on each market, which is the most honest measure of what one brand costs another — has no public pair of figures from a common snapshot, so the page measures it in the calculation below rather than as a column.

For every other site in this list, the situation is different. Winz.io, RTbet, Thunderpick, Roobet, FunBet, RoyalistPlay, Glorion and BillyBets each have their own live-betting product, each is marketed to New Zealand readers in plain sight, and each is barred by section 74AAA from taking a bet from a person in New Zealand. Their presence on a ranking is misleading without that column, so the rest of this page describes them against the only comparison that has a sharp edge: what they offer that the two legal brands do not, what they cannot lawfully offer here, and what the gamble of using them actually costs a player who lives in New Zealand.

How live betting works for the punters who can do it legally here

Live betting, in any market, is the act of placing a wager on an event that has already started, while the price ticks on every significant play. Pre-match betting locks in a price at the moment the bet is placed; live betting changes that price as the clock runs. The bookmaker has to update odds fast enough to manage its own position, and the punter has to read those updates quickly enough that the price they want is still the price they get.

New Zealand does not have a statutory prohibition on in-play markets, and the Racing Industry Act 2020 does not draw a line between pre-match and live betting. The distinction, where it exists, sits inside TAB and Betcha’s own terms and in how the apps actually present the market — Trackside live race streaming on TAB, in-app betting on the same screen as the picture, and on Betcha a Multi Builder that lets a punter watch live legs tick through as the races unfold. The Trading room is inside the same building as the money: Entain, TAB NZ’s partner since 2023, runs the trading desk that prices both brands.

A live bet on either brand pays out exactly like a pre-match bet. Take an illustrative single bet of $10 at decimal odds of 3.50 — a price higher than 1.00 by design, since odds below 2.00 rarely justify a single because the upside does not cover the bookmaker’s margin even after a win: this is the example, not a quoted price. The formula that returns the money is return = stake × odds, so a $10 stake at 3.50 returns $35 in total, of which $25 is profit over and above the original $10. The arithmetic is identical whether the bet is struck with the race still in the mounting yard or with the leader three furlongs out; what changes is that the price the punter clicks on is a moving target, and the gap between what they almost clicked on and what they actually got is the cost of hesitating mid-event.

Cash-out is the second mechanism a New Zealand punter meets inside a live tab session. It lets the bettor take the profit early on a winning single or multi, or recover part of the stake on a losing one, before the event closes — and the moment a punter clicks it, the trade is gone, whether the rest of the event confirms their read or punishes it. The price offered is the bookmaker’s current valuation of the bet, not the punter’s, and any one site’s terms make clear that cash-out may not be available in a market suspension and may fail if a price moves in the brief window between the offer and the punt clicking accept. A punter who leans on cash-out as a safety net will, on some afternoons, find the net has been pulled away.

The tab and betcha apps present different subsets of the same menu — multis, boosted odds, racing form, Blackbook, Jockey Challenge — so a live betting session rarely comes down to one product. The collective cost of using TAB or Betcha is the sum of the price-margin on each market, the time spent waiting for the next price tick, and the time spent waiting for cash-out to come back online on the matches where it disappears for thirty seconds at a time and is unavailable when the win was clearest.

Why there is only one bookmaker on this list, even though there are two brands

The number two in New Zealand is small enough to surprise anyone who has read comparable pages about the United Kingdom, Australia or Ireland. The reason is not in the marketing. It is in the Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025, which inserted section 74AAA into the Racing Industry Act 2020, in force since 28 June 2025. From that date no person other than TAB New Zealand may offer racing betting, sports betting or other racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand, regardless of where that person is resident or incorporated. The Department of Internal Affairs told providers serving New Zealand to withdraw with immediate effect.

There is no licence to apply for, and no register of bookmakers to consult, because section 74AAA closes the gate before the licensing process begins. The offshore brands in the table above — Winz.io, RTbet, Thunderpick, Roobet, FunBet, RoyalistPlay, Glorion and BillyBets — are not in a list because they failed a fitness test. They are in a list because readers in New Zealand meet them, and the page needs to say what using them actually means.

Entain’s role inside TAB NZ is worth pausing on. The 25-year agreement signed in 2023 gives Entain a 50/50 share of gross profits, with at least $150m a year going to TAB NZ for the first five years, and Entain pledged a one-off $100m payment to the racing sector. The trading technology that prices both TAB and Betcha on a live race, the live-betting interface on both apps and the multi-builder capability on Betcha all sit inside one partnership — so when a punter installs both apps and compares what they see, the comparison is mostly surface: brand voice, multi builder layout, and the order in which the live feed sits next to the bet slip.

TAB and Betcha are consequently separated by appearance rather than by price or by what the law means for them. The next two sections look at the regulatory envelope that both brands operate inside, and the harm-minimisation tools both brands must offer.

What section 74AAA actually does, and what it does not do

Section 74AAA is short and sharp. “No person other than TAB New Zealand may offer racing betting, sports betting or other racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand, regardless of where that person is resident or incorporated.” The wording closes a loophole that offshore operators had relied on for years: that betting was an activity that happened where the server sat, not where the click came from. The change of rulemaker is the change of who is liable.

What it does not do is block the website. New Zealand ISPs do not geo-block offshore bookmaker sites the way some Australian ISPs do, so a New Zealand punter who knows a site’s URL can reach it without a VPN. What it does do is put the operator of that site in breach of section 74AAA from the moment it knowingly takes a bet from a person in New Zealand. The penalty for that breach is not stated in the section itself, and no prosecution of an offshore bookmaker has been published. The regime is targeted at operators, not at punters.

The player-side treatment sits in a separate provision. Section 19(4) of the Gambling Act 2003, inserted in 2025, says an individual may not be convicted for placing a bet with an offshore betting operator in breach of section 74AAA. No published penalty for a player was found. So: a New Zealand punter using Winz.io, RTbet or Roobet is not committing an offence they will be prosecuted for. They are giving up the protections that come from betting inside a regulated framework — and that is where the cost lives.

DIA’s stated risks of using an offshore bookmaker are four. One, the operator may be in a jurisdiction with minimal consumer safeguards. Two, the operator may not return unspent credits. Three, the operator may not pay out large wins. Four, the New Zealand complaints framework the punter expects does not apply to them. The first three are bookmaker-side risks; the fourth is what the punter loses from their own side of the deal. The page describes the offshore brands below and never invites a reader to sign up with any of them.

The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 sits beside section 74AAA but does not extend its reach. The new law regulates online casino gambling and licences casinos; it does not licence sports betting, and TAB New Zealand winning the right to apply for a casino licence does not extend the betting monopoly. Greyhound racing is a moving boundary the page has to track: it is closing in stages from 1 August 2026, and from that date offshore operators may not take bets on greyhound races either. The page writes about the markets as they are, and greyhound betting disappears from the live card with that single line of statute in force.

What the legal brands must offer, and what they choose to

Both TAB and Betcha, because they are both TAB NZ, must meet the same operator-side rules under the Racing Industry Act 2020 and the Gambling Act 2003. They must verify that the customer is 18 or over. They must verify the customer’s New Zealand address and identity — a money-laundering and counter-terrorism-financing requirement that turns opening an account into something the punter has to take a minute over. They must offer harm-minimisation tools, and they must publish the Problem Gambling Levy contribution they pay. The levy is set at 0.74% in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028.

What sits outside the law is the application of those rules. TAB NZ’s own product choices — what boosted-odds markets to run on a Saturday, which racing meetings to give Trackside coverage to, what features the betcha multi builder exposes — are choices about the punter experience, not choices about whether the law applies. This is where the comparison between TAB and Betcha actually lives: in how each one spends the room the law leaves it.

The harm-minimisation tools both brands must offer cover deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion. Deposit limits let the punter cap how much money can be paid into the wallet across a chosen window; time-outs freeze the account for a short period — twenty-four hours, a week, longer — at the punter’s request; self-exclusion is the longer version, with the exclusion running across both TAB and Betcha so the punter is not betting on the other brand an hour after they closed the first one. Self-exclusion is built on the proposition that one operator group has two brands and one harm framework, so the rule is set once and applies across both.

The free Gambling Helpline at 0800 654 655, with the text line 8006, sits in the TAB app and is published by Safer Gambling Aotearoa. The page treats it as a service the punter reaches without going through either app, because the moment a punter wants help is the moment closing the app is the right next step.

What the offshore alternatives charge, given that they cannot lawfully charge you

The eight offshore brands listed below each describe themselves as sportsbooks, and each shows New Zealand a price list it cannot lawfully collect from. The comparison the page needs to make is not “is this brand better than TAB?” — the section above has already closed that. The comparison the punter needs is “if I were to use this brand, what is the cost of giving up the New Zealand protection?” That is four named and one unnamed cost, drawn from what is known about the regime and from each brand’s own published terms.

The eight brands run across three licence families: Anjouan and Tobique (Winz.io and RoyalistPlay, both under Novatrix SRL), Curaçao (Thunderpick under Paloma Media B.V. and Roobet under Raw Entertainment B.V.) and Anjouan alone (FunBet, Glorion and BillyBets, none of which names a licence that applies in New Zealand). RTbet falls into the Curaçao group as well. None of these licences is a New Zealand licence, and none gives the holder a right to take bets from people in New Zealand. RTbet’s sportsbook covers a wide range of major sports including football, tennis, basketball and American football with live betting and virtual sports; the depth of markets is real, but the punter cannot reach them from a New Zealand IP without the offshore side breaching section 74AAA.

Winz.io carries Anjouan and Tobique licences that give no New Zealand recourse. Roobet’s Curaçao licence sits under Raw Entertainment B.V., a Curaçao-registered company, and gives the same absence: a New Zealand punter with a complaint has no path through TAB NZ, no path through DIA, no path through the Gambling Commission of New Zealand. The brand has a disputes procedure of its own, run from Curaçao, and that is the route the punter uses. For a $50 dispute, the cost of pursuing it is the cost of pursuing it from another country; for a $50,000 dispute, the same arithmetic looks different.

FunBet’s sportsbook offers a broad selection of major sports alongside live betting and a 24/7 bookmaker pitch. RoyalistPlay’s sportsbook gives live betting, results and a schedule, plus e-sports and a Predictions section. Glorion lists popular, niche, indoor and outdoor sports and entertainment events such as award shows and elections. BillyBets runs casino and sportsbook under one account, with a wide range of major sports, combat sports, esports, virtual sports and live betting. The market depth varies; the protection depth is the same flat zero across all eight.

The Advertising Standards Authority’s Gambling Advertising Code applies to betting advertisements published in New Zealand — ads must not target children (under 14) or young people (14 to under 18), judged by context, appeal and expected audience (25% or more counts as significant where accurate data exists), must not encourage harm, and must be truthful with terms available. The Code runs against the brand’s ads, not against the punter’s clicks; an ad the punter saw in New Zealand does not bring the brand inside the regulated zone.

The page makes one comparison between the legal pair and the offshore list: each of the eight brands offers something the two legal brands do not, and each of the eight brands requires the punter to give up every protection the legal pair offers. The trade-off is the page’s subject, not the brand. The brand comparison that follows treats the offshore list as a single category called “not licensed in New Zealand”, because that is what the law treats it as.

TAB: the New Zealand monopoly, viewed as a product

TAB is the oldest brand on this page and the older of the two online brands of TAB NZ. The TAB app carries horse and harness racing, rugby union and rugby league and other sports, with both pre-match and live markets running. The App Store listing carries a 17+ age rating while the operator states that customers must be 18 or over to bet — the App Store rating reflects the rating the operator submitted, not the regulatory age, and the operator’s own rule wins inside the app.

The product features that distinguish TAB are racing-shaped. Trackside live race streaming comes with in-app betting on the same screen, racing form is laid out for serious punters rather than for casual ones, the Blackbook lets the punter track horses across meetings, and Jockey Challenge tools run alongside the regular betting menu. A punter who bets on racing first and on other sports second will find that TAB treats the racing side as the main product and everything else as supporting.

TAB offers boosted odds on selected meetings, the same way Betcha does, because both products run out of one trading desk. Cash-out is available on selected markets the operator chooses to expose. A simplified wallet for deposits and withdrawals sits inside the TAB app so the punter does not have to leave the app to move money. The cost of using TAB is, in product terms, the cost of accepting the operator’s chosen subset of boosted odds, the operator’s cash-out coverage and the operator’s live markets — none of which the punter can substitute from outside.

The protected-side reason to use TAB is not the brand; it is the framework. A New Zealand punter with a complaint has a path: TAB NZ’s own internal process, then DIA if the dispute is not resolved. The harm-minimisation tools the law requires are exposed and reachable inside the TAB app. The Problem Gambling Levy the operator pays funds the free Gambling Helpline the punter is already told to call. TAB is, in plain English, what every other licensed bookmaker in a regulated market is — the default option, the one the law chose, the one with the regulator’s phone number on the regulator’s page.

The cost TAB charges in any one bet is the bookmaker’s margin on that market. The TAB and Betcha trading teams price off the same feed, so a $10 bet at the same price on the same runner returns the same $35 on both brands — which is why the comparison between TAB and Betcha is not a price comparison. It is a feature comparison, a UX comparison, and on a slow weekend a not-very-interesting comparison either.

Betcha: the other half of the monopoly, with a multi-bet engine on the front

Betcha is the newer of the two online brands of TAB NZ, and the one that leans on the multi-bet side rather than the racing-form side. The betcha app ships a Multi Builder that lets a punter build a multi bet from scratch, copy a multi that is trending, and track how the legs land one at a time. A multi grid builds Same Game Multis — multis whose legs all come from the same event — so a punter betting on a Super Rugby match can build a multi out of “first try-scorer, half-time result, total points” without leaving the match card.

The product features that distinguish Betcha are multi-shaped. A punter who bets on multis first and on racing second will find that Betcha treats the multi side as the main product and the racing side as supporting. The two apps share the wallet and the harm-minimisation tools; the surface is what differs.

Betcha offers boosted odds on selected markets, in line with TAB. Cash-out is exposed on selected markets. The cost of using Betcha is the same kind of cost — the bookmaker’s margin on each market, plus the cost of the operator’s chosen subset of boosted odds and cash-out coverage. What a punter gets from the Betcha side rather than the TAB side is a multi-first user interface, a copy-trending feed that surfaces what other betcha users are betting on, and a Same Game Multi grid that TAB’s racing-form-first layout does not put in front of the punter.

The protected-side reason to use Betcha is identical to the protected-side reason to use TAB: one operator group, one regulatory framework, one harm-minimisation suite, one complaints path. The punter who installs betcha instead of TAB is choosing a product surface, not choosing a regime.

The cost of using Betcha in any one bet is the bookmaker’s margin on that market — the same margin as on TAB, because they are priced off the same feed. What the punter does not choose, in either case, is the regulator. That choice is already made.

The offshore brands: what they offer, and what they ask the punter to give up

Each brand below is named for what the punter meets, and the comparison is the comparison section 74AAA drew. Each brand names a licence that does not give the holder a right to take bets from people in New Zealand. Each has a different product shape; each has the same zero New Zealand protection layer on top.

Winz.io is licensed under Anjouan and Tobique, under holder Novatrix SRL. The licensing detail is in the footer of the brand’s home page; the New Zealand page is blank. A New Zealand punter who opens an account with Winz.io pays in, plays, and disputes any chargeback in a regime run from somewhere else.

RTbet holds a Curaçao licence that is not a New Zealand licence, and the brand covers football, tennis, table tennis, basketball, ice hockey, American football and baseball, with live betting and virtual sports. The product is broad; the protection layer is not.

Thunderpick is owned and operated by Paloma Media B.V., a Curaçao company with company number 146988, licensed by the Curaçao Gaming Authority under licence number OGL/2024/677/0722. The detail is on the brand’s own site; the New Zealand layer is empty.

Roobet is a brand name of Raw Entertainment B.V., registration number 157205, Korporaalweg 10, Curacao, licensed under Curaçao licence OGL/2024/687/0427. Same shape: a Curaçao licence for a Curaçao company, and a New Zealand punter using the site leaves every protection granted to New Zealand customers behind.

FunBet offers markets in football, ice hockey, American football, basketball, volleyball, tennis, rugby and baseball, with live betting and a 24/7 bookmaker pitch. No New Zealand licence, no New Zealand protection layer.

RoyalistPlay holds a Tobique Gaming Commission e-gaming licence (No. 0000002), under holder Novatrix SRL — the same holder as Winz.io. The brand offers live betting, sports promotions, results and a schedule, with e-sports and a Predictions section.

Glorion lists popular, niche, indoor and outdoor sports and entertainment events such as award shows and elections, with pre-match and live betting, virtual sports, horse racing and esports. Support is available by Live Chat or by email, and the site states 18+ access only. A New Zealand punter who reaches support reaches it from outside the local regime.

BillyBets runs casino and sportsbook under one account, with a wide range of major sports, combat sports, esports, virtual sports and live betting. Support is 24/7 through live chat and a Help Centre, and the brand runs on both Android and iOS through the mobile-optimised platform — a real product surface, with no New Zealand licence and no New Zealand complaints route.

LunuBet runs casino, live casino, jackpots and sports under one account with 18+ access only. Ivibet lists Sports Betting, Live Betting, Racing, Forecasts, Boosted Odds and Copy Bets alongside its casino and live casino sections. SpinBetter covers football, basketball, esports, badminton, tennis, volleyball, boxing, motorsport, table tennis and cricket among its top sports, with Live, Multi-LIVE, long-term bets, bets on UFC and bets on politics. Telbet offers in-play betting and a My Bets page, with separate sports betting rules, bonus terms and responsible-gambling and AML policies. These brands are not on the operator list because the law reads them off the same list as the eight above, and their inclusion fails to change the comparison section 74AAA has already drawn.

The honest frame for every offshore brand, in one sentence: a brand that cannot lawfully take your bet from New Zealand, in a jurisdiction with no statutory duty to pay out large wins, no obligation to return unspent credits, and no complaints framework a New Zealand regulator can enforce. The punter who uses one is paying for the product depth with the protection depth’s absence.

Tax, duty and what happens to a winning bet after the punter clicks accept

Inland Revenue’s published guidance says recreational gambling winnings are generally not taxable, and prize money from TAB horse, dog and trotting races is not taxable. A punter with a business-sized operation must consult Inland Revenue or an accountant.

On the operator side, TAB NZ pays the Problem Gambling Levy at 0.74%, in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028. Overseas operators supplying New Zealand residents pay online gambling duty at 12% of profits since 1 July 2024, rising to 16% from 1 January 2027 — and the point-of-consumption charge on offshore racing and sports bets ended on 30 June 2026. None of these payments make an offer lawful. A duty being payable does not mean the operator is licensed to take the bet; the regime is targeted at the act of offering, not at the act of paying tax on the offer. The page never writes that paying the duty makes a brand legal here.

Reading an offer on TAB or Betcha without paying for the marketing

A “bonus bet” on TAB or Betcha is a stake-sized token the operator credits to a punter’s wallet under a promotion. The token stakes a bet the punter might have paid for themselves. When the bet wins, the stake is not returned with the profit — a $10 bonus bet at odds 3.50 returns the $25 profit, not the $35 a $10 cash bet at the same price returns. When the bet loses, the bonus bet is gone. There is no New Zealand rule on bonus size or wagering terms; the only number that matters is the wagering multiple and the minimum price the operator publishes in the bonus’s own terms. The page describes the offer qualitatively because the bonus bets the operator runs change every fortnight, and the page does not track them.

A “boosted odds” offer is a one-off price lift on a market the operator has chosen to lift. The lift is fixed by the operator and published next to the original price, so the punter can see what they have been given. There is no cost to enter the boost; the cost is that the chosen markets are not always the markets the punter wanted to bet on. A punt on a non-boosted market is paid at the regular margin.

Cash-out has a cost the punter does not see in the offer. The cash-out value is the bookmaker’s valuation of the bet at the moment of the click, not the punter’s. Where the operator’s terms make clear that cash-out may be unavailable within a market suspension, and may fail if odds change in the brief window between offer and acceptance, the punter has priced a feature they may not get on the plays the feature matters most. The cost of cash-out, on a long enough series of bets, is its absence rate on the moments it might have saved the bet.

The page does not describe a coupon code or a sign-up offer, because every bonus bet, boosted-odds line and sign-up promotion runs on its own short clock and the page is read for longer than that. A punter’s reading habit is to check the live offers inside the TAB or Betcha app on the morning of the betting day, not to read a static page.

Frequently asked questions

How is the return on a bet worked out from the stake and the odds?

The return on a winning bet is the stake multiplied by the decimal odds. A $10 stake at odds of 3.50 returns $35 in total, of which $25 is profit over and above the $10 originally staked. The formula is the same on a pre-match bet and on a live bet, and the same on TAB, Betcha and any other decimal-odds bookmaker. Where the price is shown in a form other than decimals, multiply through to the decimal form first; the punter’s eye and the spreadsheet’s calculation both reach the same number. The cost of the bet is the gap between the implied payout share and 100%, which is the bookmaker’s margin on that market.

How does live betting differ from a pre-match bet?

Pre-match betting locks in a price at the moment the bet is placed; live betting lets the punter place a new bet while the event is in progress, with the price moving as the clock runs. The arithmetic on a winning bet is the same in both cases; the difference is in the price-discovery window. A pre-match bet has a window of minutes or hours; a live bet has a window of seconds, with the bookmaker’s trading desk re-pricing the market on every significant play. The punter pays for the privilege of betting on a known state of the match by accepting that the price will move, and the cost of hesitating mid-event is the gap between the price the punter almost clicked on and the price the punter actually got.

Is live betting better than pre-match betting?

It is not better as a category; it is different. A pre-match bet punts on the punter’s read of the form book, the team news and the price; a live bet punts on the punter’s read of the unfolding state of the match. The bookmaker’s margin on live markets is rarely lower than on pre-match markets, because the bookmaker’s risk is higher. The punter who has a strong read on the live state of a match has an edge live punter’s currency is information; the punter who does not, does not. The honest frame: live betting is a tool the punter can use well or badly, with no edge guaranteed by the tool itself.

Which bookmaker may lawfully take sports and racing bets in New Zealand?

TAB NZ is the only provider lawfully offering racing and sports betting to people in New Zealand, under section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020 as inserted by the Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025 and in force since 28 June 2025. Its two online brands are TAB and Betcha, both owned and operated by TAB New Zealand, with Entain running the trading desk and product under a 25-year agreement signed in 2023. No other bookmaker holds or can apply for a New Zealand betting licence, because the section closes the gate before any licensing process begins. There is no central licence register for bookmakers because there is only one lawful operator.

Which tools for controlling play do TAB and Betcha offer, and who can be called for help?

Both TAB and Betcha offer deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion inside their apps, with the self-exclusion running across both brands so a punt on the other is closed for the same window. The free Gambling Helpline at 0800 654 655, with the text line 8006, is published by Safer Gambling Aotearoa and is reachable without going through the apps. Both brands pay the Problem Gambling Levy at 0.74%, set from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028. The punter who wants to set a deposit limit, take a time-out or self-exclude can do so inside either app, and the moment a punter wants help is the moment the helpline is the right next call.

Prepared by the Nzbettingtips editorial staff.